A- de 2006
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
✓Claimant Pedro Polo Barrios
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Cargos deben ser claros, ciertos, específicos, pertinentes y suficientes
- Requisitos
- Carga argumentativa se incrementa
- No formulación en debida forma del cargo de sustitución de la Constitución
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (22 points)
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el auto del doce (12) de septiembre de dos mil seis (2006) mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Pedro Polo Barrios contra la expresion "en todo caso perderan vigencia el 31 de julio de 2010" del tercer paragrafo transitorio del Acto Legislativo 01 de 2005.
- SEGUNDO. ARCHIVESE el expediente.
- JAIME CORDOBA TRIVINO
- Presidente
- JAIME ARAUJO RENTERIA
- Magistrado
- MANUEL JOSE CEPEDA ESPINOSA
- Magistrado
- RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
- Magistrado
- MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
- Magistrado
- NILSON ELIAS PINILLA PINILLA
- Magistrado
- CON ACLARACION DE VOTO
- HUMBERTO ANTONIO SIERRA PORTO
- Magistrado
- ALVARO TAFUR GALVIS
- Magistrado
- CLARA INES VARGAS HERNANDEZ
- Magistrada
- MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA DE MONCALEANO
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.